I have trained, I have educated, they are not the same thing.
An important distinction:
Education is what we know for life. Whether your job changes or the world around you changes, these are skills that you will take with you and always use. Skills like critical thinking, reading and writing, and arithmetic.
Training teaches time-sensitive and task-specific skills. For instance, your library subscribes to the database Books in Print. A friendly trainer traveled to your library to train you on this product three years ago, however Books in Print 2.0 has just been released. The database has changed and now you will need to be retrained on how to use the tool.
The technology that helped usher in an internet revolution and democratic change in Tunisia and Egypt may be just as damaging to democracy as it is helpful. In March of this year (2011), Eli Pariser made this argument in his TED talk (watch below). Based upon his book, The Filter Bubble: What the Internet is Hiding from You, he describes an Internet that reflects back to the user exactly what he wants to see.
Within 24 hour of this being sent out by moveon.org, (of which the author is affiliated) the four copies within my library system went from available to checked out. Right now, I am waiting on a waiting list to read the full argument. See if your local library has a copy here: WorldCat
Last fall I worked with a class on how to be information literate when it comes to biographical sources. Autobiographies, biographies, and memories are often filled with half-truths, altered-truths, or none-truths (lies). It is a matter of getting students to figure out the author’s bias and when to be critical of what they are reading.
Information literacy is about making savvy information consumers. In the literature there are lots of examples of hoax websites that get cited over and over again. While they can make for a fun day in the classroom, most online examples are laughably obvious. Websites like: Save the Pacific Northwest Tree Octopus or RYT Hospital. The truly dangerous and hard to identify stuff comes from professionals in the field, academics, and popularized researchers: Those who publish “real” books through “real” publishers. Examples of this nature make students stop laughing and sit up.
The example that I use in my classes is that of Stephen Ambrose; the popular historian that every American has heard of, if not read. In the April 26, 2010 New Yorker, the article Channelling Ike lays out a detailed case for made up interviews and facts in Ambrose’s biographical books on the life of Dwight D. Eisenhower. In the Slate, the article The Plagiarist: Why Stephen Ambrose is a Vampire explores his long history of plagiarism.
National Public Radio (NPR) aired a piece last week on memoirs and their “murkey” nature. Entitled ‘Tea’ Debacle Reflects The Murky Waters Of Memoirs,1 this piece explores a broad range of current authors who’s memories are faulty. NPR followed this up with a piece that explores the responsibility of the publisher when it comes to the facts.2 (See below to hear both.) Some authors are much more interested in a good story than the facts, that is something we all need to keep in mind.
‘Tea’ Debacle Reflects The Murky Waters Of Memoirs
Vetting Memoirs A Tricky Problem For Publishers:NPR